LJ erroneously hijacks affiliate links?
Thursday, March 4th, 2010 01:43 pmIt appears that LJ added in some code which redirected links to certain e-commerce domains to other domains (although this script seems to have stopped?) (This company seems to be the one involved. Possibly this program? Also mentioned here. And explained by a user of the program here. )
http://community.livejournal.com/no_lj_ads/87066.html
http://atara.livejournal.com/631445.html
http://vichan.livejournal.com/392527.html
Not being a coder or familiar with affiliate marketing, I don't really understand the technical aspects of it, but it's not really clear what LJ really meant to do. Does anyone know what the actual intention of this code probably was? And if so, how could they muck it up so much?
It seems that, whatever the intention of this code was, that it may have caused LJ users to lose money.
http://community.livejournal.com/no_lj_ads/87066.html
http://atara.livejournal.com/631445.html
http://vichan.livejournal.com/392527.html
Not being a coder or familiar with affiliate marketing, I don't really understand the technical aspects of it, but it's not really clear what LJ really meant to do. Does anyone know what the actual intention of this code probably was? And if so, how could they muck it up so much?
It seems that, whatever the intention of this code was, that it may have caused LJ users to lose money.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-05 08:52 am (UTC)So of course the Support people wouldn't have known to look out for possible funky things happening to affiliate links. That puts any mysterious affiliate yoinkage happening into the realm of Mysterious Glitches, and those are a lot more work to track down and figure out, and since Support is overworked, there is not a lot of time to do that. And, well, affiliate links being wrong is kind of...not the highest user support priority? I mean, I think trying to figure out other technical glitches that are affecting people's use of the site probably attracts more effort. If not a lot of people are reporting it (and I don't think there were--else it would have come out a lot sooner), then it's harder to bump it up the priority list.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-05 08:56 am (UTC)The whole testing thing seems really ridiculous. To have the links not even going to the right place... Totally defeats the whole "secret" nature of the program. Probably no one would have figured it out for awhile if it weren't for that.
I suppose not too many people really use/care about affiliate links, but I'm surprised that more people didn't notice links being borked, so perhaps there were other technical things that triggered the problem.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-07 12:22 am (UTC)