Tumblr vs. LJ?
Tuesday, October 12th, 2010 10:31 amPrompted by fears that people are abandoning LJ for Tumblr, some LJ users have started a movement for people to take a month-long break from Tumblr.
http://oxymoronassoc.livejournal.com/576168.html
http://captaincatapult.livejournal.com/202549.html
http://glassbomb.livejournal.com/533599.html
While I have no interest in participating in such a campaign, I hadn't realized that so many people were apparently moving from LJ to Tumblr (Tumblr's growth is continuing, though, and those new users must be coming from somewhere). Personally, I see no reason why the two can't coexist, and I suspect that Tumblr's popularity is because of its ease of use, lower pressure, and also because the personal, locked component on LJ is migrating to FB and locked Twitters (Tumblr doesn't, IIRC, have much emphasis on the locked aspects of its service).
Some highlights:
http://glassbomb.livejournal.com/533599.html?thread=10800479#t10800479 : on how Tumblr is "for pictures." Tumblr's interface for uploading pictures is much easier than LJ's, I must say.
http://captaincatapult.livejournal.com/202549.html?thread=6170421#t6170421 : Some find LJ too full of bashing of their favorite shows/characters.
http://oxymoronassoc.livejournal.com/576168.html?thread=5528232#t5528232 : Apparently, people are also starting to post fanfic on Tumblr, thus meaning that it's not only about pics there.
Anyone else have other links? Have you noticed any LJ-->Tumblr migration? I noticed that some of the people on these posts, also, are claiming they've seen a big slow-down of LJ activity compared to last year.
In any event, I think one thing which also defines Tumblr is that, unlike LJ, it's developing consciously within a niche, and they are very willing to experiment with new features, and axe them if they don't make the cut.
In other news, now you can use Twitter as an identity on LJ, meaning you can comment using your Twitter account. Reportedly, according to Russian sources, in this update you'll also be able to crosspost a Tweet digest to LJ on a daily basis automatically, and be able to view all posts by a specific user within a community.
http://oxymoronassoc.livejournal.com/576168.html
http://captaincatapult.livejournal.com/202549.html
http://glassbomb.livejournal.com/533599.html
While I have no interest in participating in such a campaign, I hadn't realized that so many people were apparently moving from LJ to Tumblr (Tumblr's growth is continuing, though, and those new users must be coming from somewhere). Personally, I see no reason why the two can't coexist, and I suspect that Tumblr's popularity is because of its ease of use, lower pressure, and also because the personal, locked component on LJ is migrating to FB and locked Twitters (Tumblr doesn't, IIRC, have much emphasis on the locked aspects of its service).
Some highlights:
http://glassbomb.livejournal.com/533599.html?thread=10800479#t10800479 : on how Tumblr is "for pictures." Tumblr's interface for uploading pictures is much easier than LJ's, I must say.
http://captaincatapult.livejournal.com/202549.html?thread=6170421#t6170421 : Some find LJ too full of bashing of their favorite shows/characters.
http://oxymoronassoc.livejournal.com/576168.html?thread=5528232#t5528232 : Apparently, people are also starting to post fanfic on Tumblr, thus meaning that it's not only about pics there.
Anyone else have other links? Have you noticed any LJ-->Tumblr migration? I noticed that some of the people on these posts, also, are claiming they've seen a big slow-down of LJ activity compared to last year.
In any event, I think one thing which also defines Tumblr is that, unlike LJ, it's developing consciously within a niche, and they are very willing to experiment with new features, and axe them if they don't make the cut.
In other news, now you can use Twitter as an identity on LJ, meaning you can comment using your Twitter account. Reportedly, according to Russian sources, in this update you'll also be able to crosspost a Tweet digest to LJ on a daily basis automatically, and be able to view all posts by a specific user within a community.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-12 10:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-12 10:48 pm (UTC)....Of course, nowadays I hardly read any LJ comms, so it's not v. useful for me, unfortunately.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-12 10:54 pm (UTC)I have a Tumblr, and when people do long-format writing on it, it's very confusing to me, particularly when it's reblogged. I detest that LJ imported this feature, because I feel like in both cases, it's not always obvious who originally wrote the thing. Publishing fanfic with these sorts of "features" just seems like a Really Bad Idea to me - and how do you even get feedback? I would think it feels more like shouting into the void than anything else.
I find Tumblr really great for sharing stuff in the format of a post that will fit on a single screen. While the attribution thing is still a bit problematic, I think it's also a really good interface for sharing other peoples' work that's in that single-screen format. The updating and reading tools come across as meant for squee and beauty and simple stuff; once you're over a paragraph or a screen, I feel much more encouraged to skim, and I'm not sure why.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-12 10:57 pm (UTC)I'm not sure how they get feedback... Maybe they don't really care about feedback, or they do it via reblogs? I've seen quite a bit of discussion via reblog, but I've also seen long-form posts as well, especially among music journalist bloggers.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-12 11:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-12 11:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-13 12:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-12 11:11 pm (UTC)Facebook is the thing that slurps away on the non-fandom side. WordPress, self hosted or on WordPress.com, if they're public bloggers looking to move to something more geared for that. Twitter for public blurbing. But I can't really say I've seen much Tumblr pointing to drifting across my LJ flist. But maybe they just make them and don't say? I'm going to suspect though, if they wouldn't remember to link to the Tumblr they were using on their LJ, it's not Tumblr exactly that's stealing them away.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-12 11:17 pm (UTC)I think Tumblr fits a niche between WP and Twitter, for people who want something bloglike than Twitter, with similar community features.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-12 11:21 pm (UTC)I think there's also Posterous in between...Tumblr and WordPress? Ha! I've lost one or two to that, I think, for unlocked content.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-12 11:24 pm (UTC)Yeah, there's Posterous too, and actually, the private blogging features there are better than Tumblr's IMHO, but since Facebook and Flickr seem to have private media mostly sewn up, Posterous doesn't seem to be really going in that direction.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-12 11:23 pm (UTC)I have, as a matter of fact. Many of the people who were once staples on my flist have now moved to Twitter or Tumblr... I find the more fannishly inclined stick with Tumblr.
I feel like there's less ~pressure~ on Tumblr compared to LJ and it's filters and friending policies and rant communities.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-12 11:27 pm (UTC)So the relative lack of privacy features, and the following model creates less pressure. That could definitely be a feature, not a bug, to many.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-12 11:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-13 03:29 am (UTC)Fanart ppl, not surprisingly, seem to find Tumblr eventually more congenial than LJ. Too - picspams, fanvids, macros, and other multimedia are now more central to Fandom (have increased in relative prestige qua fan production) than they were 5 years ago - let alone stuff like Twitter RPs - and Tumblr is a far better platform for *curating* such items than LJ. I actually get the feeling that various forms of Fandom have colonized the "fuckyeah" Tumblr space, for instance. I haven't seen any longform text fanfiction on Tumblr as of yet, but I have seen quite a few multimedia narratives, webcomics, illustrated shorts et al.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-13 06:09 am (UTC)Yeah, Tumblr is just superior for multimedia. Hah, why do you capitalize fandom, though?
no subject
Date: 2010-10-13 01:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-13 07:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-13 09:24 am (UTC)Tumblr seems to be a great place for curation as an art form, not just original content as an art form.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-13 09:40 am (UTC)Hah, and now you can import Twitter into LJ automatically, it seems. What do people think of that so far?
I don't know, with some types of original content (or semi-original), it does seem to be popular.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-13 09:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-13 09:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-13 09:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-13 11:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-13 03:41 pm (UTC)Russian source? Much more officially, it's been all over
http://community.livejournal.com/changelog/9195909.html
http://community.livejournal.com/changelog/9173699.html
http://community.livejournal.com/changelog/9168914.html
I, personally, "get" neither Tumblr nor Twitter. I just don't really see the point in either.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-13 04:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-15 06:17 pm (UTC)1) In an ecosystem as large and diverse as Livejournal, there will be small pockets where people move to any and every service under the sun. There's probably a small pocket where everyone's gone off to exchange baked stone tablets marked with Greek characters.
2) Livejournal and Tumblr are different forms of performance art. Livejournal invites and encourages reaction to be read alongside the original post. Tumblr makes it very difficult to comment in the same way. Contributor expectations are, to some extent, managed by the system architecture. I'm thinking of the difference between a printed newspaper, and the website version with commentators going at it beneath the story.
3) Livejournal and Tumblr are different forms of performance art. Livejournal in general (and this clone in particular) tends to prefer text posts, and the generous entry limits make it possible for full essays to be posted in one go. As one of the commentators earlier mentioned, Tumblr prefers the brief - an iconic image, a single tune, a brief piece of writing. Livejournal is far weaker at mixed media collages - pictures are adequate, videos are a mess, audio remains a complete blind spot.
4) I suspect there has been a genuine reduction in activity (specifically, substantive posts) in many English-speaking corners of Livejournal. Some people have abandoned ship for The Facebook, others for Tw*tter, others for Wordpress, others will simply have got an actual life and given up. Livejournal's problem is that it isn't drawing from the pool of talented, quality text writers in English as well as it did in about 2004.
5) Some people will moan about anything.
Dammit, there's a full post lurking in here.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-15 06:48 pm (UTC)4) Yeah, nowadays people who are starting out (if there are many of them) are probably more likely to become either WP bloggers if they're doing it publicly, or post long notes on FB if they don't like the publicity.