Posterous vs. Twitpic!

Wednesday, June 30th, 2010 11:52 pm
charmian: a snowy owl (Default)
[personal profile] charmian
So, Posterous has been continuing with its import from 'dying platforms' campaign. Some of their choices were rather odd (a social network for Realtors?) and some of the platforms definitely not dying (Tumblr). Anyway, they set up an import from Twitpic, and then Twitpic blocked them.

http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/29/twitpic-posterous-lawyers/
http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/30/lawyers-are-expensive-we-can-be-friends-posterous-to-twitpic/

Posterous appears to be winning the PR battle anyway, though. Standing in the way of data portability is simply not a popular position.

Date: 2010-07-01 04:50 pm (UTC)
foxfirefey: A guy looking ridiculous by doing a fashionable posing with a mouse, slinging the cord over his shoulders. (geek)
From: [personal profile] foxfirefey
Looks like they're aiming their barrels straight at LJ, too--but badly. Support for public posts only really aren't enough for most LJs, I think.

Date: 2010-07-02 07:37 am (UTC)
foxfirefey: A wee rat holds a paw to its mouth. Oh, the shock! (thoughtful)
From: [personal profile] foxfirefey
You're right--I didn't read your last post deeply (work has been quite busy recently), but it's not just Ning and LJ that have less than ideal implementations. You can't import nonpublic posts from Vox (if it works at all, even), or get any actual dates for posts from Xanga. It seems like most of these importers are pretty half cocked. Other leads just seem strange to go after--Active Rain?

Is a PR blitz really effective if the main impression a potential convert could get is that you don't really understand their needs or know how to implement something that works well for them?

May 2014

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18 192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags