Regarding this comment which I linked in an earlier post.
The person who made the comment has responded, explaining their remarks, in a comment to that post.
To summarize it, the person says that they heard from a volunteer that the volunteer looked up someone's history of support requests in the course of investigating a support request that the user did not feel was adequately dealt with. However, this does not seem to me to necessarily indicate any kind of abuse of power.
Also, to reiterate something: all public posts (unless I make it technically impossible to do so, like turning off comments) are open to comments from anyone (that is, unless you're a spammer/leaving OT/inappropriate comments).
The person who made the comment has responded, explaining their remarks, in a comment to that post.
To summarize it, the person says that they heard from a volunteer that the volunteer looked up someone's history of support requests in the course of investigating a support request that the user did not feel was adequately dealt with. However, this does not seem to me to necessarily indicate any kind of abuse of power.
Also, to reiterate something: all public posts (unless I make it technically impossible to do so, like turning off comments) are open to comments from anyone (that is, unless you're a spammer/leaving OT/inappropriate comments).
no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 01:03 am (UTC)Yeah, I suggested to them that if that wasn't what they meant to imply, they should leave a comment clarifying what they meant. I think people should take responsibility for any allegations they make, by clearly retracting them if they can't stand behind them any more. >_<