recent LJ controversies, Three Weeks for DW

[charmian]

Been busy translating some stuff, although I am planning to put up some links about the latest Facebook events.

Hmm, at this point a lot of my thoughts about LJ's latest scandal regarding the Driving Revenue/Outboundlinks stuff can be summed up by this animated .gif. Here are tips on dealing with the issue, in case you haven't heard already.

Also, there's a comm on DW dedicated to creating exclusive content for DW for three weeks. Since most of the content in this blog is original and not cross-posted to anywhere else, I guess you could say I'm already 'participating.' Anyhow, this campaign makes me wonder whether it is true that one of the impediments to DW growth is that there is a dearth of original content on DW?

Poll #2875

Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 55

View Respondents

What do you think the main factor impeding/slowing DW growth is?

View Answers

Lack of DW-exclusive content
6 (10.9%)

Dearth of active comms
33 (60.0%)

Invite code system
3 (5.5%)

Insufficient publicity
1 (1.8%)

Something else which I will detail in comments
12 (21.8%)

Comments

[eruthros]

Yeah, I tend to prefer activities in personal journals, or really specific comms, so I am also happy on DW!

I think, though, that part of the impetus for three weeks for DW for some folks is using it as encouragement to post to comms/keep comms active, so that it's not just a challenge addressing a lack of DW-specific content, it's also addressed at encouraging posting to communities, so!

Re: some BNFs, I suspect that's it's partly BECAUSE the whole flist of thousands wouldn't move with them! Like, I moved pretty much wholesale, stopped posting to lj (though I had brief visions of posting different content there, it hasn't happened), and partly that's because I had nothing invested in the numbers of my flist, just some of the people, and many of them were going to move/crosspost. So maybe I lose the twenty people who were inflating my numbers because they friended me in 2005 and didn't unfriend me before leaving fandom - oh well! (Some of the people making up those thousands must have left fandom/lj, but they still show up on the profile, so even if "everyone" moved for a BNF they'd still lose some numbers, I think!)

[torachan]

Yeah, I do think they'd lose some, especially some who aren't actively following them anymore (I mean, hell, even I have probably 20 people on my LJ flist or more who are dead journals and I have like 250 friends of), but the bulk of the followers, the ones who are active and commenting, those would probably comment on DW as well.

[charmian]

I think that might be so, about the BNFs. Maybe also, though, with those folk, it could be because it's not about the numbers, but about the key people. If their closest friends won't move w/ them, or the people they most value, then they have less incentive to close off comments or stop cross posting.