Haha, what's with LJ news now?
Thursday, October 29th, 2009 05:45 pmI think they have a new person doing LJ news now, cause there's like widespread scorn and drang about the LJ news post being made without an LJ cut (again), and it being filled with Question of the Day responses and photos and possibly breaking people's friends list pages.
Also, this isn't the first time they did it: they start off the post with "In response to user comments from last week, we want to let you know that we'll remain LJ cut-free for the next month in order to get more eyeballs on our evolving newsletter."
Now that is guaranteed to get a response. Maybe not a good one, though. Is their secret wish for all of the people who complain to leave the comm?
IMHO, at some point there will be major drama involving the QotD. They'll post something that offends someone, or post answers that offend someone, or like, someone will get angry about being quoted or not attributed.
Also, this isn't the first time they did it: they start off the post with "In response to user comments from last week, we want to let you know that we'll remain LJ cut-free for the next month in order to get more eyeballs on our evolving newsletter."
Now that is guaranteed to get a response. Maybe not a good one, though. Is their secret wish for all of the people who complain to leave the comm?
IMHO, at some point there will be major drama involving the QotD. They'll post something that offends someone, or post answers that offend someone, or like, someone will get angry about being quoted or not attributed.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-30 05:16 am (UTC)Poor Marta was sick last week, so Sue did it solo for the first time. Oh, how it showed.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-30 05:35 am (UTC)Since this is apparently the second one, I see the learning curve is taking awhile...
no subject
Date: 2009-10-30 05:38 am (UTC)I think I missed my window of opportunity for grading her performance on the first one.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-30 05:54 am (UTC)She has succeeded in making me want to read the next post, but maybe not in the way she was hoping.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-30 06:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-30 06:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-30 06:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-30 06:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-30 07:13 pm (UTC)