Random graphs
Wednesday, February 2nd, 2011 01:00 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
charmian(note, you might need to be logged into google to see the full graph)
Was bored and looking at Google Trends, randomly.
http://trends.google.com/websites?q=myspace.com&geo=all&date=ytd&sort=0
In the past year, Myspace has lost over 50% of its traffic.
This made me curious to see how LJ was doing.
http://trends.google.com/websites?q=livejournal.com&geo=all&date=ytd&sort=0
Globally, LJ has stayed stable, with around two million daily visitors.
http://trends.google.com/websites?q=livejournal.com&geo=RU&date=ytd&sort=0
In Russia, traffic has risen significantly over the past year, to around over ~1.4 (maybe 1.5) million.
http://trends.google.com/websites?q=livejournal.com&geo=US&date=ytd&sort=0
In about a year, the US daily visitor traffic, however, has gone from ~500K to somewhat under ~400K. This represents around a 20% decline. (Thusly, Russian traffic is about three times the size of US traffic, and the US contributes 20% of LJ's visitors, if Google Trends' stats are correct.)
Was bored and looking at Google Trends, randomly.
http://trends.google.com/websites?q=myspace.com&geo=all&date=ytd&sort=0
In the past year, Myspace has lost over 50% of its traffic.
This made me curious to see how LJ was doing.
http://trends.google.com/websites?q=livejournal.com&geo=all&date=ytd&sort=0
Globally, LJ has stayed stable, with around two million daily visitors.
http://trends.google.com/websites?q=livejournal.com&geo=RU&date=ytd&sort=0
In Russia, traffic has risen significantly over the past year, to around over ~1.4 (maybe 1.5) million.
http://trends.google.com/websites?q=livejournal.com&geo=US&date=ytd&sort=0
In about a year, the US daily visitor traffic, however, has gone from ~500K to somewhat under ~400K. This represents around a 20% decline. (Thusly, Russian traffic is about three times the size of US traffic, and the US contributes 20% of LJ's visitors, if Google Trends' stats are correct.)
