Communities vs. Fora
Wednesday, April 15th, 2009 08:14 amSo now DW has a population of over 1000. The average age seems quite a bit higher than on LJ.
ONTD on LJ has over 90,000 members. Man... Now that's a huge comm.
Speaking of comms, I was thinking that LJ comms are basically group blogs, but a group blog is not always what a community needs. It all depends what the topic of a community is. For things that are time dependent, or where the object of the discussion is to comment on the OP's post, group blogs work fairly well. Examples of this are gossip, and to some extent groups dedicated to sharing creative works (although there are downsides to the blogging format, and often such groups would also be well served by a non-time dependent CMS/gallery format), links sharing sites like mefi, news discussion groups, anything where there is quick obsolescence.
However... for a group designed for discussion, is that really the best format? If we're discussing a book series, where there is not frequent new information, isn't a forum in some was a better format? That way topics are bumped up to the top of the list depending on how many people reply to them, and older topics can retain their prominence on the forum if people find them relevant enough to keep posting to them. I think this format also helps newbies find older important discussions more easily. There might also be an end to annoying "hi, introducing myself" tendencies if there was a dedicated forum post for them pinned to the top.
ONTD on LJ has over 90,000 members. Man... Now that's a huge comm.
Speaking of comms, I was thinking that LJ comms are basically group blogs, but a group blog is not always what a community needs. It all depends what the topic of a community is. For things that are time dependent, or where the object of the discussion is to comment on the OP's post, group blogs work fairly well. Examples of this are gossip, and to some extent groups dedicated to sharing creative works (although there are downsides to the blogging format, and often such groups would also be well served by a non-time dependent CMS/gallery format), links sharing sites like mefi, news discussion groups, anything where there is quick obsolescence.
However... for a group designed for discussion, is that really the best format? If we're discussing a book series, where there is not frequent new information, isn't a forum in some was a better format? That way topics are bumped up to the top of the list depending on how many people reply to them, and older topics can retain their prominence on the forum if people find them relevant enough to keep posting to them. I think this format also helps newbies find older important discussions more easily. There might also be an end to annoying "hi, introducing myself" tendencies if there was a dedicated forum post for them pinned to the top.