charmian: a snowy owl (Default)
charmian ([personal profile] charmian) wrote2009-11-19 05:01 pm
Entry tags:

Loudtwitter thoughts?

Poll #1737 What do you think about Loudtwitter digests in LJ or DW?
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 61


Do you use Twitter?

View Answers

I use Twitter frequently
34 (55.7%)

I have an account, but use it infrequently
17 (27.9%)

I only use my account to read
2 (3.3%)

I don't have a Twitter account
8 (13.1%)

Other (write in comments)
0 (0.0%)

What do you think of Loudtwitter digests in LJ or DW?

View Answers

I use Loudtwitter myself to post my tweets
2 (3.3%)

I don't use it, but I like it
3 (5.0%)

Indifferent; I don't care one way or the other
14 (23.3%)

Dislike because I use Twitter and so it's something I already see
16 (26.7%)

Dislike because I don't like to read tweets
12 (20.0%)

Dislike for some other reason (comment on your own)
8 (13.3%)

Other (write in comments)
5 (8.3%)



This question was vaguely inspired by the new LJ account on... Facebook, where they seem to be asking people about such issues. I'm actually kind of surprised that there wasn't an official page already.
sofiaviolet: drawing of three violets and three leaves (Default)

[personal profile] sofiaviolet 2009-11-20 12:43 pm (UTC)(link)
I ignore LoudTwitter posts - if I want to see the other person's tweets, then I'm already following them on twitter.

But I don't mind them - I have a userscript that collapses and expands posts on my reading page (so I don't have to scroll). On lj, I'm subscribed to people's posts via the notification system, so the full text shows up in my lj inbox, and I can delete anything I don't feel like reading.