Well, then, they must be happy that some indicators seem to suggest that LJ is less of a going concern than it is. 0_o I guess they don't realize that due to natural attrition, it's not optional for a service to get new people to replace the old ones.
Though, I don't get why it would be an 'intrusion to privacy.'
Yeah, this is not 2000, after all. This is an age of huge social network competition.
no subject
Well, then, they must be happy that some indicators seem to suggest that LJ is less of a going concern than it is. 0_o I guess they don't realize that due to natural attrition, it's not optional for a service to get new people to replace the old ones.
Though, I don't get why it would be an 'intrusion to privacy.'
Yeah, this is not 2000, after all. This is an age of huge social network competition.